Next-Gen Image Format

WebP Deep Dive

A modern image format developed by Google. Designed to provide superior lossless and lossy compression for images on the web.

Supports Transparency
Supports Animation

INTRA_PREDICTION_ENGINE

px0
px1
px2
px3
px4
px5
px6
px7
px8
px9
px10
px11
px12
px13
px14
px15
TARGET: BLOCK_0
PREDICTOR: NONE
RESIDUAL: CALCULATING...

VP8 Intra-prediction Simulation

Extreme Compression,
Retained Details.

WebP's compression efficiency comes from its block-based predictive coding. It uses parts of the image that have already been decoded to construct predictions for new pixels.

This means smaller file sizes, faster load times, and lower bandwidth consumption.

JPEG (Original) 100 KB
WebP (Lossy) 65 KB (-35%)
Google WebP

* Based on SSIM quality index, WebP lossy is 25-34% smaller than JPEG at equivalent quality.

Core Logic of Compression

function Predict(NeighborPixels) {

// Predict current pixel using neighbors

Predicted_P = Average(Left, Top, TopLeft);

// Store only the difference (Residual)

return Actual_P - Predicted_P;

}

WebP doesn't store every pixel's color directly (like BMP). Instead, it "guesses" the current pixel's color based on surrounding known pixels. It only needs to store the small amount of data where it "guessed wrong" (the residual). This drastically reduces file size.

All-Rounder Features

Not just a JPEG replacement, but an evolution of PNG and GIF.

Lossy & Lossless

WebP is unique in supporting both lossy compression (VP8 video tech) and lossless compression (WebP Lossless).

Alpha Transparency

Even in lossy mode, WebP supports an 8-bit Alpha channel. This is something JPEG cannot do.

Animation Support

WebP can replace GIF. It supports lossy and lossless animation, usually 64% smaller than GIF.

Underlying Architecture

Predictive Coding

WebP lossy compression is based on VP8 key frame encoding. It splits the image into 16x16 macroblocks and further into 4x4 sub-blocks for prediction.

Entropy Encoding

The residual data and motion vectors undergo context-based Arithmetic Coding, which is more efficient than JPEG's Huffman Coding.

comparison.log
Format Bits/Pixel
JPEG (Q=80) 2.65
WebP (Q=80) 1.82
> Efficiency gain detected: ~31%